<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ColderICE eCommerce Blog - Latest Comments in Is Bing.com REALLY Bigger than Twitter and Digg Mythbuster Challenge</title><link>http://colderice.disqus.com/</link><description>Ecommerce News and Video Education</description><atom:link href="https://colderice.disqus.com/is_bingcom_really_bigger_than_twitter_and_digg_mythbuster_challenge/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:04:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Bing.com REALLY Bigger than Twitter and Digg Mythbuster Challenge</title><link>http://colderice.com/is-bingcom-really-bigger-than-twitter-and-digg-mythbuster-challenge/#comment-13382276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Vince&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The traffic from &lt;a href="http://Live.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Live.com"&gt;Live.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://MSN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="MSN.com"&gt;MSN.com&lt;/a&gt; are bigger than the others mentioned &lt;a href="http://cnn.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="cnn.com"&gt;cnn.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://digg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="digg.com"&gt;digg.com&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;. But the claim that &lt;a href="http://bing.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bing.com"&gt;bing.com&lt;/a&gt; is already bigger than these implies that since its launch, people now voluntarily go to &lt;a href="http://bing.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bing.com"&gt;bing.com&lt;/a&gt; -- which they would normally have to do when a brand new site launches -- e.g. &lt;a href="http://WolframAlpha.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WolframAlpha.com"&gt;WolframAlpha.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But in this case, users do not voluntarily go there. Microsoft is redirecting all traffic there, including even desktop search (how unsavory). Some users may even be surprised when they notice the URL automatically changed from &lt;a href="http://live.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="live.com"&gt;live.com&lt;/a&gt; (which they typed) to &lt;a href="http://bing.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bing.com"&gt;bing.com&lt;/a&gt; (which they did not type).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the MYTH of bing being bigger than those 3 sites shortly after launch because people like it enough to voluntarily go there is BUSTED. BUSTED. BUSTED.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and P.S. there will be no "upclimb" from any "new starting point."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Augustine Fou</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Bing.com REALLY Bigger than Twitter and Digg Mythbuster Challenge</title><link>http://colderice.com/is-bingcom-really-bigger-than-twitter-and-digg-mythbuster-challenge/#comment-13382275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Vince, thanks for the insight&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Bing.com REALLY Bigger than Twitter and Digg Mythbuster Challenge</title><link>http://colderice.com/is-bingcom-really-bigger-than-twitter-and-digg-mythbuster-challenge/#comment-13382274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John,  sad truth, is the claim is indeed true, not BUSTED.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bing resides on top of &lt;a href="http://msn.search.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="msn.search.com"&gt;msn.search.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://live.search.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="live.search.com"&gt;live.search.com&lt;/a&gt; robots, spidering the net.  You will still not see a "&lt;a href="http://bing.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bing.com"&gt;bing.com&lt;/a&gt;" search engine coming into a website, the old spiders still at work.&lt;br&gt;By the looks of it, msn and live WERE larger than the others noted, so they just rolled it into bing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just standard marketing hype, as usual, but not really a BUST here is it?. the graph will reverse itself soon. The upclimb from the new starting point will be the truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's the same thing quantcast does - it provides ratings per website or per "network" to "quantize" or monetize a web holding by rolling traffic together across sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vince jelenic</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>